Process Engineer/ELE/EDP - Process Engineer/ELE/EDP Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

1.0
Sep 10, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GP is a Very large corporation that is highly dedicated to substantial growth and development of its operations. As a subsidiary of Koch industries, it reinvests 90% of its earnings into the business. This is evident by Many large capital projects in progress at many of its production facilities. This unparallel to its paper competitors making GP an excellent company to be apart of if you want a long term stable career.

Cons

While GP clearly shows a dedication to growing the business Unfortunately they do not see its own people as an essential part to this. While the starting wage for entry level engineers is decent don’t be fooled, bonuses and raises are hard to come by. In addition, the focus at the mills is highly production driven. Operations is on a strict time line and employees are often rushed and overloaded. While safety is talked about daily and said to be important, most operators and even some lower level managers don’t believe upper management considers it a priority when little capital and/or time is provided to fix major safety concerns. Additionally, new engineers are provided little to no direction upon entering the mill. I was given a 6 month training checklist from HR. a large majority of it had nothing to do with my job therefore My supervisor had told me not to worry about it. He provided no further guidance as to what my job entailed except that I should be “engaged and excited at work”. No one will show any dedication to helping you learn your job and develop your career because everyone is overworked. My advice, If you have a good GPA, with solid co-op/internship experience , avoid the paper industry all together.

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good company and people to work

Cons

nothing so far i experience

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All