Marketers and Aspiring Leaders - Watch Out - Anonymous employee Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

2.0
Oct 30, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people actually doing the work MBM in principle The coffee makers

Cons

This is not an organization that understands marketing or prioritizes it. Do not come here if you’re looking to advance your marketing skills or make an impact You have to pay for parking Highly political organization Preference to talkers vs those who are truly qualified Misuse of MBM Pay and merit increases don’t exist and don’t happen on an annual basis. You have to ask and they can deny you based on performance Highly matrixed Org and having to involve everyone makes it very difficult to get anything done or moved forward No real decision rights to workers but no one wants to make a decision at upper levels Very reactive Not a data driven business despite saying they are; it’s a buzzword with no rigor Keep middle management and below in the dark on critical business results due to lack of trust Women have a very tough time here and HR is generally ineffective Hoteling office concept very distracting and makes it hard to collaborate

avatar
Georgia-Pacific Response
4y
Hello, this is Molly from Talent Solutions and I wanted to first, thank you for sharing your feedback and leaving us a review. I am disappointed to read of your experience. We work to create a culture that fosters career growth, innovates and is data driven, and respects all employees and backgrounds. I want you to know that I am sharing your feedback with the appropriate leadership team as opportunities. Thank you again!

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
May 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, good benefits, stable job

Cons

Lots of travel, very corporate

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All