Low Retention Rate and Sub Standard Treatment of Employees - Maintenance Technician Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

1.0
Jan 11, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A wide variety of technical applications to broaden hands on experience of entry level technicians.

Cons

From the management to the smoke and mirror union in place and every step in between, a constant and poisonous culture thrives ever vigilant in it's quest to identify, publicize and manipulate any perceived (or in most cases completely imagined) misstep in order to allow the slimy and misguided fungal folk to squeeze out each and every insignificant and trivial "step up." These lurkers in the background, observers of life in general operate under the notion of some folktale, more superior position within the company; when, tragically (and painfully obvious to most functioning adults) the damage caused by their cowardly and shameful behavior is not only eroding away the professional lives of their victims but their own as well.

avatar
Georgia-Pacific Response
4y
Thank you for taking the time to leave us a review. Please know that treating everyone with respect and embracing change are at the core of our culture. It is our expectation that this is being done at all levels within the organization. Your post has been shared with the appropriate leadership as feedback as well. Thank you again- Cali from Talent Solutions

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good company and people to work

Cons

nothing so far i experience

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All