Mediocre Company That Does Not Invest in Their Employees - Anonymous employee Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

2.0
Aug 29, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people Location MBM Good 401k That is about it

Cons

Employees typically receive a pay increase once every for years. IComp is limited (despite what you might be told before making a decision to join GP) and will typically come down once you receive a salary increase. This keeps your total compensation flat as inflation continues to increase. Career mapping is next to impossible unless you have been at GP for close to ten years. They say you own your career, but you can't drive your career unless you are given the opportunity. Driving results is not rewarded so most people in HQ do as little as possible to get by. Why work your tail off when you know it won't lead to a promotion, salary or compensation increase? You are treated like a number at GP. It is SOP to let excellent talent walk out the door only to replace them with someone a lot more expensive and with 1/2 the knowledge. Stay away from this place. Especially if you are not tied to Atlanta or have CPG experience. If you are considering joining GP, reach out to ex-GP employees that are connected to you via linkedin. Ask them about their experiences. No company is perfect, but there are very few that treat their employees worse than GP.

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible. Good team. Fulfilling. Kind people

Cons

Plant people can be irritable

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All