employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Geosyntec Consultants

Is this your company?

Sweatshop for employees, mental vacation for management - Senior Staff Geologist Geosyntec Consultants Employee Review

1.0
Aug 10, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salaries are decent (at least initially). Benefits are very good, medical, dental, vision, 401k. Many projects are challenging and unique. There are some technically brilliant people in the company.

Cons

-The performance review process is a sham. In reality, there is very little feedback from management and performance isn't noticed. -The vast majority of employees are salaried and work very hard (60+ billable hour weeks are the norm). Every billable hour over 36 in a week is pure profit for Geosyntec, but employees are not rewarded with meaningful bonuses, promotions, or raises. -Poor performance on the part of those within the inner circle is rewarded. -Management is disrespectful, dishonest, often incompetant, and has a tendancy to cover their own inadequacies by sacking the junior level staff that they should be mentoring and training. -The work environment is more adversarial than collaborative. -Human resources inquiries into management issues have resulted in the sacking of the plaintifs in the past.

Explore other reviews about Geosyntec Consultants

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Well run and well-respected overall

Cons

Only the cons typically associated with the env consulting field, nothing company-specific

4.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a lot of variety of work available for those seeking it and eager to diversify their skill set. Cross collaboration between groups, offices, and practices is highly encouraged. It has been a unique experience among other consulting firms I’ve worked at, as Geosyntec prizes doing cool work on cool projects over just trying to maximize how much money is coming in. The atmosphere doesn’t feel internally competitive, and there isn’t generally a sense of possessiveness of work amongst managers and working groups. Many projects I’ve been on have been multidisciplinary efforts with teams assembled from all over to get the right people in the right position on each project, regardless of who may be the “profit center” for the revenue.

Cons

Sometimes, because of the pros described above, organization of projects can feel a little stretched thin, and the consequence of such collaboration and cross-team work sharing can sometimes lead to a lacking of accountability in the leadership structure on a project, as people are performing work for other groups and managers they do not directly or indirectly report to. Additionally, I feel like the company is a little top heavy on senior managers, principals, and senior principals, and it can feel as a mid-career employee that there isn’t enough early-mid career support on projects.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All