employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Geosyntec Consultants

Is this your company?

Geosyntec Huntington Beach Office is not the place to build a career - Anonymous employee Geosyntec Consultants Employee Review

1.0
May 24, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good benefits - Interesting projects

Cons

- Low salary - Discriminatory environment - Heavy employee turnover due to toxic work environment - Equal opportunity policy is not practiced - Incompetent management Geosyntec consultants has many offices in the US and overseas most of which are good places to work at. This review is particularly based on my experience in the Huntington Beach, California office. Huntington Beach office is known within the company to be the worst office of all Geosyntec offices. This office has a very toxic atmosphere with very negative sense of competition and a very "political" vibe. The management here does not put much weight on real measures and standards documented in the company's policy for promotion of employees. The decision to promote someone is often based on personal relationships and whether or not promoting a certain person is beneficial to the position of the promoting manager!

Explore other reviews about Geosyntec Consultants

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Well run and well-respected overall

Cons

Only the cons typically associated with the env consulting field, nothing company-specific

4.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a lot of variety of work available for those seeking it and eager to diversify their skill set. Cross collaboration between groups, offices, and practices is highly encouraged. It has been a unique experience among other consulting firms I’ve worked at, as Geosyntec prizes doing cool work on cool projects over just trying to maximize how much money is coming in. The atmosphere doesn’t feel internally competitive, and there isn’t generally a sense of possessiveness of work amongst managers and working groups. Many projects I’ve been on have been multidisciplinary efforts with teams assembled from all over to get the right people in the right position on each project, regardless of who may be the “profit center” for the revenue.

Cons

Sometimes, because of the pros described above, organization of projects can feel a little stretched thin, and the consequence of such collaboration and cross-team work sharing can sometimes lead to a lacking of accountability in the leadership structure on a project, as people are performing work for other groups and managers they do not directly or indirectly report to. Additionally, I feel like the company is a little top heavy on senior managers, principals, and senior principals, and it can feel as a mid-career employee that there isn’t enough early-mid career support on projects.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All