employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Geosyntec Consultants

Is this your company?

Talented Scientists and Engineers. Poor management and upward mobility. - Anonymous employee Geosyntec Consultants Employee Review

2.0
Oct 11, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very smart and motivated employees at all levels. Interesting projects and ability to work within your academic focus, for the most part. Genuine people and opportunity to works with lots of different professionals. Vacation days are good at mid/sr level. Lots of sick time. Good ESPP.

Cons

Marketing is very good in the northeast but everywhere else their support is unhelpful when it comes to putting together proposals. In addition, most individuals do not even know how to use the CRM platform. This leads to lost opportunities/leads and ability to sell laterally to former/current clients. Promotions at mid/sr level take much longer than other firms. Yearly salary adjustments are very low. High turnover. Poor 401k vesting (6 years) Too high of standards for work performance/goals leads to burnout. Conflict avoidant management that does not communicate well.

Explore other reviews about Geosyntec Consultants

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Well run and well-respected overall

Cons

Only the cons typically associated with the env consulting field, nothing company-specific

4.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a lot of variety of work available for those seeking it and eager to diversify their skill set. Cross collaboration between groups, offices, and practices is highly encouraged. It has been a unique experience among other consulting firms I’ve worked at, as Geosyntec prizes doing cool work on cool projects over just trying to maximize how much money is coming in. The atmosphere doesn’t feel internally competitive, and there isn’t generally a sense of possessiveness of work amongst managers and working groups. Many projects I’ve been on have been multidisciplinary efforts with teams assembled from all over to get the right people in the right position on each project, regardless of who may be the “profit center” for the revenue.

Cons

Sometimes, because of the pros described above, organization of projects can feel a little stretched thin, and the consequence of such collaboration and cross-team work sharing can sometimes lead to a lacking of accountability in the leadership structure on a project, as people are performing work for other groups and managers they do not directly or indirectly report to. Additionally, I feel like the company is a little top heavy on senior managers, principals, and senior principals, and it can feel as a mid-career employee that there isn’t enough early-mid career support on projects.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All