employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Geosyntec Consultants

Is this your company?

Toxic Lakewood office is in shambles - Professional Scientist Geosyntec Consultants Employee Review

1.0
Mar 26, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A few good people to work with. Some interesting projects.

Cons

Toxic work environment, particularly in the Lakewood office with current Branch management. Punitive actions taken on people who do not work more than 40 hours/week. Collaboration and friendliness is lacking; cannot trust coworkers. Snarky attitude from higher-ups. A large percentage of employees have left the Lakewood office for very similar reasons, leaving the office a sad, lonely desert that crushes employee spirit. Although I left a few years ago, I have continued to hear bad things. Turnover rate is astronomical. Diverse learning and working styles are not appreciated and employees are viewed as numbers rather than human beings. All of the interesting, funny, dynamic people who make work enjoyable are pushed out by competitive, jealous workaholics who continue to drive the company culture into the ground.

Explore other reviews about Geosyntec Consultants

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Well run and well-respected overall

Cons

Only the cons typically associated with the env consulting field, nothing company-specific

4.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a lot of variety of work available for those seeking it and eager to diversify their skill set. Cross collaboration between groups, offices, and practices is highly encouraged. It has been a unique experience among other consulting firms I’ve worked at, as Geosyntec prizes doing cool work on cool projects over just trying to maximize how much money is coming in. The atmosphere doesn’t feel internally competitive, and there isn’t generally a sense of possessiveness of work amongst managers and working groups. Many projects I’ve been on have been multidisciplinary efforts with teams assembled from all over to get the right people in the right position on each project, regardless of who may be the “profit center” for the revenue.

Cons

Sometimes, because of the pros described above, organization of projects can feel a little stretched thin, and the consequence of such collaboration and cross-team work sharing can sometimes lead to a lacking of accountability in the leadership structure on a project, as people are performing work for other groups and managers they do not directly or indirectly report to. Additionally, I feel like the company is a little top heavy on senior managers, principals, and senior principals, and it can feel as a mid-career employee that there isn’t enough early-mid career support on projects.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All