employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Geosyntec Consultants

Is this your company?

Performance is not important. - Anonymous employee Geosyntec Consultants Employee Review

1.0
Jun 7, 2011
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent pay and benefits package.

Cons

1.Widely spread territories require a lot of travel. 2.Highly unstable managerial staff. Do NOT outperform them. They will praise you right up until they can fire you. 3.Managers do NOT want to hear about any great ideas you have. Rocking the boat will get you fired without warning. Please don't confuse them with a factual analysis of any better ways than they thought of. 4.If you are in the clique, all manner of incompetence is ignored. 5.Managers ding you for users' complaints regardless of the veracity of the complaint. No opportunity to discuss or rebutt is given. 6. Communication and training is kept to a minimum. Learning the system is trial and error. Of course, errors can get you fired without warning. 7.Workstation and facilities provided to do work were insufficient. I had to cobble together enough power and network connections to work. 8.Overall, for a largish company, it is still run like a little family business.. if you're not family.. well, you get the picture.

Explore other reviews about Geosyntec Consultants

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Well run and well-respected overall

Cons

Only the cons typically associated with the env consulting field, nothing company-specific

4.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a lot of variety of work available for those seeking it and eager to diversify their skill set. Cross collaboration between groups, offices, and practices is highly encouraged. It has been a unique experience among other consulting firms I’ve worked at, as Geosyntec prizes doing cool work on cool projects over just trying to maximize how much money is coming in. The atmosphere doesn’t feel internally competitive, and there isn’t generally a sense of possessiveness of work amongst managers and working groups. Many projects I’ve been on have been multidisciplinary efforts with teams assembled from all over to get the right people in the right position on each project, regardless of who may be the “profit center” for the revenue.

Cons

Sometimes, because of the pros described above, organization of projects can feel a little stretched thin, and the consequence of such collaboration and cross-team work sharing can sometimes lead to a lacking of accountability in the leadership structure on a project, as people are performing work for other groups and managers they do not directly or indirectly report to. Additionally, I feel like the company is a little top heavy on senior managers, principals, and senior principals, and it can feel as a mid-career employee that there isn’t enough early-mid career support on projects.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All