Supply chain professional - Anonymous employee Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
Apr 20, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Endless opportunities to grow and advance your career 2. Very open atmosphere culture 3. You can be yourself 4. If you have the desire, passion, and aptitude to do something, Halliburton will give you a chance even if you don't have the educational background.

Cons

Unfortunately, Halliburton does not have flex schedules (9/80s, 19/30s, or a work from home policy). This puts them behind the curve with competitors in other industries. The reasoning is Halliburton is a service company and needs to be available to it's customers, which is true. However, there are several companies that practice flex schedules and also ensure they have proper coverage. It can be done.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All