Technical Professional - Technical Professional Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
Aug 30, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are great at Halliburton and during the good times (when oil is not <$50 a barrel) it is a great company to work for. Pay and benefits are competitive with other oilfield service companies. The training aspect is one of the real highlights of Halliburton. They provide excellent training opportunities through professional development programs.

Cons

As you can probably read in the paper, the oil and gas industry has be hit hard recently and this has really affected the oil field services sector. Halliburton is no exception to this and most of the employees have had to endure watching an endless parade of layoffs. This has negatively impacted moral. Halliburton is a commodity-based service company, so innovation not as valued as it is in other companies. This may be frustrating for some.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All