If have a better offer take it, but can lead to better opportunities. - Associate Technical Professional - Frac/Acid Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
Jul 14, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Halliburton's recognition helps when looking for next opportunity. The classroom training in Duncan OK is the only real training. Less than one year of employment I had offers for other opportunities with significantly better pay.

Cons

Halliburton's engineer culture is more of a fraternity and initiation than it is a professional culture of a multinational company. Does not value their engineers, the development or retention of experienced and knowledgeable engineers. Treats their engineers as just a number, would rather let go of engineers and hire new engineers than develop those they hire or retain those with experience and knowledge.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All