Associate Technical Professional - India - Anonymous employee Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
Sep 9, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Stress on Safety of employees, Very process oriented, they follow Halliburton Management System (HMS) for everything and HMS is extremely good system compiled by some of the best in the industry. Safety awareness and training opportunities in plenty. Domain knowledge and expertise is easily accessible, you can have your questions answered by best in the industry and can gain from their knowledge. Opportunities to grow are easily available. All employee dealings with HR will be on SAP and it is very systematic.

Cons

You must know that they are looking for the best of the best, though they may not hire the best. Your communication skills, written language, temperament, personality, social bonding, technical knowledge, endurance everything will be put to the test. Introverts will find it very difficult to grow infact they may perish soon. Join them if you have a go-getter attitude. Otherwise stay away, it will scar you for life. Payscales are lower than their competitors.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All