Greedy company. - Anonymous employee Halliburton Employee Review

1.0
Sep 22, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good health insurance and decent benefits.

Cons

Management (especially upper management) is out of touch with the field staff. We are the ones on the front lines sacrificing our time with our families to make the company money. They work you non-stop with little pay and no relief. We were already short staff in the field and numerous people quit. Instead of trying to hire more people to at least replace the ones that left, they make us work more for less pay while saving them money. They leave you out on a job for weeks at a time without know when you will be able to go home to see your family. When you do get home, it's for a couple of days and then they expect you to go back to work again for weeks without any relief. All this while management is sitting back at home spending time with their families and sleeping in their own beds collecting their bonuses that the field employees earn for them. They do not care or listen to us when we all tell them that we are unhappy and will leave. We are just a number to them.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All