Middle of the road - Instructional Designer Halliburton Employee Review

3.0
Oct 21, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people who are passionate about what they do. Although these people are few and far between, when you run into them it's like a breath of fresh air or a glass of cold water on a hot day. If you are lucky enough to work with them regularly, Halliburton is a great place to work. If not, you count the moments until you have a chance to bump into them and collaborate on a project with them!

Cons

Upper management is very hierarchical and there is a definite "caste" system in place with regards to leadership. Instead of seeing all employees as potential leaders, upper management places them in boxes that they are seemingly never able to climb out of. Another large con was the way in which communication was handled regarding the move of the entire HR division to a new office location. For many, the move was a huge increase in commute, and was going to be a hardship on many employees. Instead of discussing it openly and addressing concerns, upper management simply said "it's Houston, and you should expect to drive an hour or more to work."

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Halliburton is a good company to work at.

Cons

the company faces inherent challenges linked to the volatile energy market

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All