empty promises and a glass ceiling if you aren't in the good ol boys club - Engineer Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
Jan 15, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

opportunities to learn about the oilfield and technology, if you seek it out. training is

Cons

Promises of advancement are empty, nepotism is rampant. Watch people who start working the same time as you, who work less, climb the ladder because of who they know, not the work they do. Zero concern for employees desire when discussing their future. You do what they ask, move when they ask, and be grateful for the opportunity weather you like it or not. 12-14 hours days are not out of the ordinary, and vacation? You better have internet access and your phone handy. be ready to work 60+ hour weeks and some on the weekend.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Halliburton is a good company to work at.

Cons

the company faces inherent challenges linked to the volatile energy market

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All