Halliburton is a poor-boy operation where the P&L statement rules and every employee is expendable - Executive Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
Feb 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The employees themselves are wonderful people There is ample opportunity for travel -- both domestic and international There is a clear path for career growth for field personnel in the discrete services

Cons

The company organizational structure is a matrix style organization. The CEO likes to tell people it creates "dynamic tension". The reality of this dynamic tension is that every part of the organization is out to succeed at the expense of the other groups and, given the way each group is incentivized, the whole organization turns into a "dog-eat-dog, every man for himself" environment. The Oil & Gas Service Sector is notorious for knee-jerk reactions to every unexpected surprise; but the thing that sets Halliburton apart is that, because employees are expendable commodities, every knee-jerk reaction usually includes firing whole lots of people. And, given the back-stabbing environment created by the point discussed above, the only way to survive in this company is to adopt this philosophy and behavior for yourself. If you can't lower yourself to treat others this way, you will be on the receiving end at the next knee-jerk reaction.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Teaches the fundamentals of the oil and gas industry.

Cons

Sometimes knowing the direction of the project is difficult.

1.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Halliburton looks strong on the outside, especially on a resume, and the brand name still carries weight in the industry. Some teams work on interesting projects, and if you get a fair manager, you can learn a lot about large-scale B2B operations.

Cons

If you land under the wrong manager, performance improvement plans (PIPs) can be used as a weapon, not a coaching tool. I was put on a PIP that contained inaccurate claims even after I shared detailed evidence and context. I provided several solid pieces of documentation to HR to rebut the accusations, yet nothing meaningful was investigated or corrected in my case. HR felt more like a shield for management than a neutral party. In my experience, they protected internal politics instead of looking at facts and evidence. There is a culture of quiet compliance. Many people stay 10+ years because the pay and brand are “safe,” but they are hesitant to challenge unfair treatment or speak up about toxic behavior. Corporate hierarchy is heavy, and real decisions seem to depend more on who is backing your manager than on actual performance or documented facts.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All