Great Place to Work - Operator Assistant I Frac/Acid Halliburton Employee Review

5.0
Nov 3, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

My crew had a great leader and the other crew members were very helpful. We worked 2 weeks on 1 week off, but most of us would stay as long as we could. We did not have a lot of drama. Being on a frac pad, we got about 110 hours/wk. Training is probably the best in the industry.

Cons

Some other crews were not so lucky, it is all luck of the draw. The training does not really carry over to the field as strictly as they say, but they are still very high in safety.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Halliburton is a good company to work at.

Cons

the company faces inherent challenges linked to the volatile energy market

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All