Good Benefits, Annoying People - Associate Technical Professional Halliburton Employee Review

3.0
Oct 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not a bad company to start out with - the training program is really great and you learn a lot about the industry. Good benefits - 401k matched to 4% and half matched to 6%, dental, vision, stock purchase plan gives you a 15% discount, monthly bonuses, easy to move up every couple years. It is really good in terms of money. I have made some good friends in the company as well, you learn who to look out for.

Cons

The people act like they personally own the company as far as the economics go. Everyone is always looking for ways to save the company money. I assume higher management gets some sort of bonus incentive for this, but also everyone is just really obsessed with sucking up to the higher up people to try to ensure they won't get fired/laid off. Employees are constantly throwing each other under the bus and not owning up to their own mistakes because everyone is very disposable. The company doesn't mind firing people because there is a line of other people wanting the job. Also the hours are strange and long, but that is what you get in this industry.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All