4 Months - Associate Technical Professional - Cementing Engineer Halliburton Employee Review

1.0
Nov 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Field service employees are nice. Management not so much. Basically Houston makes all the decisions and they aren't even out in the field to see what goes on. Take off those suits and get in the game management. Benefits are great... or were great...

Cons

I was entry level mechanical engineer that just graduated college. They let me go after 4 months because they had to reduce staff. I worked harder than any of the engineers there and the only reason I was let go was because they were reducing staff and I was "new" (they can't say this but I know it was the reason). All the field guys knew me because I worked hard. They occasionally knew the other engineers because they occasionally went to the field which we were SUPPOSE to do since we were field engineers.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All