Service Supervisor - Service Supervisor I Halliburton Employee Review

3.0
Feb 16, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

loved working with the crew. You spend a lot of time with the guys and they become your family. Pay and bonuses were good when the oil prices were high, but when they got lower they cut out bonuses and cut hours, which I understand, but you also have to pay the employees for the hours they actually work

Cons

a lot of time away from home. when times are good it's good, when they are bad they want to cut hours and barely pay you when you are working hours away from home and staying in man camps. Hard to have a family life. Management wouldn't pay my guys for hours they worked on multiple occasions. I brought it up and well then I got "laid off" I have all documentation of the management telling me they wouldn't pay even though they know we worked them.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All