Leadership needs to learn how to lead - Software Engineer Handshake Employee Review

2.0
Apr 15, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Handshake's best asset is its people. There are tons of motivated people who really believe in Handshake's mission. -The tech stack is a bit of a mixed bag, with some areas being very modern while others are stuck in the past. This is typical for a tech company though and Handshake is making strides to improve the coding environment for its developers. - Work life balance is also decent. It used to be much better before some of the more recent culture changes happened, but it’s still not bad.

Cons

Upper leadership's ability to lead and inspire is minimal. Upper leadership has made several top-down decisions recently with what seems like little thought as to how the people impacted by their decisions will be affected. Then when leadership gets negative feedback on their decisions, they seem to act surprised like they hadn't considered that decision might not be popular. Furthermore, there seems to be no accountability for upper leadership. The effectiveness of upper leadership's decisions and initiatives are not tracked anywhere visibly, and if their decision has a negative impact there appear to be no consequences. In short it often feels like leadership doesn't know how to lead and they are figuring it out as they go. Leadership’s recent attempt to change Handshake's culture seems like a massive misstep. Leadership did not provide much detail for what they wanted the new culture to be except for "performance" and they did not describe what it was about the old culture they were trying to improve.

Explore other reviews about Handshake

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work at your own pace.

Cons

Task limit when new to project.

2.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It's flexible and sometimes the money is OK. I got paid most of what they owed me.

Cons

Generally disorganized. The task I was on was one of the more highly paid ones but it was almost impossible to actually do in the allotted time. You aren't supposed to use AI but I think people must. The tasks run far over the time they are supposed to take. The human review system also seemed almost arbitrary. Reviewers did not have the subject matter expertise they claimed to. You will make less than the advertised hourly rate because the tasks routinely take longer than they say they will. If they have averages that are lower, those people are either not submitting accurate hours (there is incentive not to) or are using AI to train AI, which is a bigger problem (but not yours).

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All