employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Plants vs. People - Anonymous employee Harvard University Employee Review

2.0
Aug 12, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Beautiful place to wander and explore -Truly separate from Harvard - allow autonomy of programming, more competitive salaries

Cons

-Truly separate from Harvard - no oversight from central HR -No diversity -Shift in priorities from caring for the landscape to being aesthetically driven -Misogynistic!! -Good ol' boys club -Culture of bullying -Minimal appreciation for non-male, non-senior management office and horticultural staff -Low morale -No room for growth -Internal conflict between being a "great research facility" and being a public park

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Light work if you have the right team

Cons

Low pay for amount of work

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Union and benefits for non-profits/higher ed. Wonderful colleagues outside of leadership!

Cons

GSD Development and Alumni Relations (under current leadership) is an incredibly toxic work environment. I didn't realize the intensity of the toll it took on my until after leaving, and I am not one to leave a negative review, but as they are hiring for several positions currently, I wish to share words of caution with applicants. Cons: - Absolutely not a safe space for anyone who is Black, brown, trans, queer, working-class, or disabled - 100% top-down direction. No room for personal exploration, initiative, or creativity. - Minimal guidance from leadership - Frequent pivots, even in the late stages of projects - Petty, immature talking behind your back by leadership - No upward mobility unless the Associate Dean or Dean like you - Deeply disingenuous comments, reflections, and feedback from leadership - Complete lack of transparency on direction, goals, etc. - Small mistakes are made cornerstones of performance evaluations, while leadership routinely missteps. Leadership never takes accountability. - Top-down policy decisions, completely lacking detail, thought, and care outside of legal ramifications - Ever-changing in-office requirements

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All