employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Senior Sponsored Adminstrator - Assistant Director of Finance Harvard University Employee Review

4.0
Nov 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great learning opportunities and job growth. Harvard is such a large institution you are exposed to many different types of projects and funding sources. The Faculty are world class and the projects they work on critical to many national and international organizations.

Cons

Some sponsored administration roles can be very narrow and focused. You can get bored in your job quickly once you learn it. There are opportunities for classes and trainings but it can be hard to take them with work. There is no formal job or career path, so you must establish that for yourself. Managers can be hit or miss. If you have a supportive and normal manager consider yourself lucky!

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Light work if you have the right team

Cons

Low pay for amount of work

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Union and benefits for non-profits/higher ed. Wonderful colleagues outside of leadership!

Cons

GSD Development and Alumni Relations (under current leadership) is an incredibly toxic work environment. I didn't realize the intensity of the toll it took on my until after leaving, and I am not one to leave a negative review, but as they are hiring for several positions currently, I wish to share words of caution with applicants. Cons: - Absolutely not a safe space for anyone who is Black, brown, trans, queer, working-class, or disabled - 100% top-down direction. No room for personal exploration, initiative, or creativity. - Minimal guidance from leadership - Frequent pivots, even in the late stages of projects - Petty, immature talking behind your back by leadership - No upward mobility unless the Associate Dean or Dean like you - Deeply disingenuous comments, reflections, and feedback from leadership - Complete lack of transparency on direction, goals, etc. - Small mistakes are made cornerstones of performance evaluations, while leadership routinely missteps. Leadership never takes accountability. - Top-down policy decisions, completely lacking detail, thought, and care outside of legal ramifications - Ever-changing in-office requirements

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All