Poor Outlook - Engineer Hatch Employee Review

1.0
Jul 7, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work/life balance Nice people to work with (depends on locations) Good variety and experience on projects

Cons

Unable to get and maintain work in a poor environment. They can't compete with other engineering firms in difficult times, their rates are too high for a similar quality product. During the mining boom, they had ridiculous rates and massive margins. Work was easy to obtain and they could turn away work, without ever having to look for any. This drove up the share price and number of shareholders. During the downturn, they are trying to maintain these margins and returns. This is extremely hard to achieve with their business model and is leading to poor decisions and a toxic work environment. They replace local engineers and managers with Canadians, who they claim are 'world experts'. After many years of trying to get work in Minerals Processing in Australia, they finally hired a local expert and got lots of work (no surprise there). Hopefully they keep them rather than replace them with a Canadian 'expert'. They treat junior staff extremely poorly. There is a culture of black-mail and threats to get them to do unappealing work, outside of their contracts. Focused on shareholders and associates. Other staff are treated poorly and led on with the promise of shares. White+Male engineers will have a slow career progression, the CEO inferred this in various talks. They are trying to achieve an equal representation in the workplace, despite the office and industry not having this.

Explore other reviews about Hatch

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

great work environment, very communicative and collaborative. Easy and open communication with PMs and upper leadership.

Cons

need to be proactive to get work, especially if you're new. lot of travel, pro or con depending on your outlook.

1
3.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exceptional project exposure across major U.S. transit, infrastructure, and energy pursuits — the portfolio and client roster are genuinely impressive and great for your professional brand The LTK Engineering Services acquisition brought in a strong, collaborative office culture that is noticeably more grounded and people-focused than the broader Hatch Ltd (Canadian entity) culture Strong brand recognition in the A/E/C space that opens doors with major public agencies

Cons

Hired under the Client Action Team structure, which led to significant instability — multiple management changes in a short period with little transparency or consistency Overlapping time zones and regional boundaries create constant coordination friction; the flat hierarchy sounds good on paper but breaks down quickly when accountability is unclear and no one owns decisions Zero flexibility on in-office requirements — no hybrid accommodation even when the nature of the work doesn't require it Promotions are not merit-based. Advancement appears tied to visibility metrics like road safety observations and office attendance rather than the quality or impact of your work — deeply frustrating for high performers

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All