Senior Engineer - Anonymous employee Hatch Employee Review

3.0
Nov 7, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I think they honestly tried to do their best. Pretty much everyone was at least OK and most were excellent. Better than most other Canadian EPCM firms. Reasonable work life balance if you are not a pushover.

Cons

Pathetic at business planning, marketing and client schmoozing. Overhire in booms and then massive layoffs. They still advertise they have 11,000 employees...LOL...more like 7,000..why the lies? if you are not an associate you are pretty much a contract employee with benefits. They will whack you with absolute employment standards minimum..."thanks for coming out".

Explore other reviews about Hatch

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

great work environment, very communicative and collaborative. Easy and open communication with PMs and upper leadership.

Cons

need to be proactive to get work, especially if you're new. lot of travel, pro or con depending on your outlook.

1
3.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exceptional project exposure across major U.S. transit, infrastructure, and energy pursuits — the portfolio and client roster are genuinely impressive and great for your professional brand The LTK Engineering Services acquisition brought in a strong, collaborative office culture that is noticeably more grounded and people-focused than the broader Hatch Ltd (Canadian entity) culture Strong brand recognition in the A/E/C space that opens doors with major public agencies

Cons

Hired under the Client Action Team structure, which led to significant instability — multiple management changes in a short period with little transparency or consistency Overlapping time zones and regional boundaries create constant coordination friction; the flat hierarchy sounds good on paper but breaks down quickly when accountability is unclear and no one owns decisions Zero flexibility on in-office requirements — no hybrid accommodation even when the nature of the work doesn't require it Promotions are not merit-based. Advancement appears tied to visibility metrics like road safety observations and office attendance rather than the quality or impact of your work — deeply frustrating for high performers

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All