Review - Anonymous employee Hatch Employee Review

2.0
Mar 12, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good colleagues willing to help, but no proper training provided. Sink or swim mentality. - Big office

Cons

- Biased in terms of giving out opportunities and firing people. They'll try to retain their female staff to preserve the gender ratio, yet its board members are mainly white Caucasian males. - They brainwash the juniors in thinking how good the company is because its privately owned etc. and how they nurture their juniors, yet when times are tough, they are willing to let them all go once their probation ends. - The rates they charge their clients is absurd, in comparison to how much they pay their employees. - No work means no job, make sure you join this company when there is a lot of work, or prepared to get fired. - Everyday work is brain numbing, and the work you're doing is simply copy and pasting from previous projects, completely put me off working in consulting. - Salary progression is slow and they dangle the stock option in front of people when they've worked their hearts out getting them clients.

Explore other reviews about Hatch

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

great work environment, very communicative and collaborative. Easy and open communication with PMs and upper leadership.

Cons

need to be proactive to get work, especially if you're new. lot of travel, pro or con depending on your outlook.

1
3.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exceptional project exposure across major U.S. transit, infrastructure, and energy pursuits — the portfolio and client roster are genuinely impressive and great for your professional brand The LTK Engineering Services acquisition brought in a strong, collaborative office culture that is noticeably more grounded and people-focused than the broader Hatch Ltd (Canadian entity) culture Strong brand recognition in the A/E/C space that opens doors with major public agencies

Cons

Hired under the Client Action Team structure, which led to significant instability — multiple management changes in a short period with little transparency or consistency Overlapping time zones and regional boundaries create constant coordination friction; the flat hierarchy sounds good on paper but breaks down quickly when accountability is unclear and no one owns decisions Zero flexibility on in-office requirements — no hybrid accommodation even when the nature of the work doesn't require it Promotions are not merit-based. Advancement appears tied to visibility metrics like road safety observations and office attendance rather than the quality or impact of your work — deeply frustrating for high performers

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All