Great company to work for - Anonymous employee Health Catalyst Employee Review

5.0
Sep 27, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Integral leadership that strives to make decisions and live by stated values. Enthusiastic and talented team members, that like to work hard, but have fun while doing it. Excellent benefits and employees are treated well.

Cons

Lots of change related to growth. this is not really a bad thing, just that nothing will ever remain the same for long. One company value is no micromanagement, but there are pockets of it that need to be addressed.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
9y
Thanks for your thoughts!

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Jan 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All