Great place to work, but sometimes things feel stuck - Analytics Engineer Health Catalyst Employee Review

4.0
Sep 25, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The work/life balance is the best I’ve experienced and I doubt I’ll experience better. I have an excellent manager who supports me in my personal and technical growth. Being able to work from home from the time I started has been a huge benefit in my life. The PTO, educational benefits, paternity/maternity leave, cell phone, internet, gym, etc are all great. I’ve grown and learned quite a bit in the nearly three years that I’ve been here, and been able to take on much more responsibility and feel more capable. At other jobs, I’ve felt like I’ve leveled out pretty quickly, but I still see more and more opportunity for my knowledge and skills to increase.

Cons

A couple of things. This is still the best place I’ve ever worked, but no place is perfect. One thing I’ve noticed is that it feels like career growth is limited for people who didn’t join early on. My team has had very static leadership despite team expansion. Health catalyst is quick to call minor pay increases a “promotion.” This is subjective, but to me, a promotion should be significant. Going up a half step in a leveling chart isn’t a promotion, it’s just a natural pay progression. On my more frustrating days, it feels like this is a means of telling lower level employees that they should be happy with the promotion situation, but I’ve been unsatisfied with it. I really like the product I work on and would like to stay with Health Catalyst for a long time, but it is disappointing to feel like my career growth has been artificially slowed based on leveling charts and various factors, some of which are beyond the company’s control. Another weakness I see is that poorly performing team members get pulled along even when they don’t contribute. As the most experienced engineer on my team, I’ve had to pick up the slack when coworkers can’t do their work or don’t do their work. It’s not that I work with many people like this, but my own responsibilities are significant and I’ve had multiple occasions this year where my own work has gotten put on hold while I spend days finding shoddy and or incomplete work from some weaker teammates. Their performance issues are known, but they get off rather light. Some managers do a poor job protecting the time of technical employees. A technical employee shouldn’t be on 8 calls a day, they should be focusing on the work. Meetings are not efficient or productive. I spend most of the calls I’m on sitting and listening to people talk. Meeting bloat is real and needs to be reined in.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
5y
Thank you for your review, feedback and advice, and for contributing to the company's success these past three years. I appreciate your feedback regarding the promotion process and ensuring that promotions are meaningful. I also appreciate your feedback regarding the importance of performance management. We're working to improve in both of these areas as part of our 2021 planning process, and we'll provide updates here in our next few all team member meetings. I appreciate your willingness to play a leadership role in software engineering on your product team. I hope we can enable your continued engagement and satisfaction so you'll choose to stay at Health Catalyst for years to come. Best, Dan

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Jan 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All