HC is a good company - Data Engineer Health Catalyst Employee Review

4.0
Feb 26, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Worthwhile mission - Trustworthy executive leadership team - Solid benefits - Good co-workers - Great work life balance

Cons

The biggest con for me was career growth. I was at Health Catalyst for about 5 years. Four of those years were spent doing the same job function. I received a few generous raises but my responsibilities didn't change. I hit a plateau where I wasn't gaining new skills or responsibilities, I felt like the only way for me to progress was to leave Health Catalyst. Career path is an issue leadership at HC has addressed for years and it is much better within certain parts of the company.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
4y
Thank you for your review and feedback, and for your six years of contribution at Health Catalyst. I'm sorry we didn't make enough progress on enabling great career progression to retain you for more than six years. Please know that we love welcoming HCAT alums back to Health Catalyst! And we're still working to provide every team member with meaningful career progression experiences! Best, Dan

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Jan 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All