Taking steps backward - Analytics Engineer Health Catalyst Employee Review

3.0
Jan 1, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leaders genuinely care about employees specifically in the areas of self care and areas outside of the workplace. The mission is important throughout the company and present during projects.

Cons

This feedback speaks to the post COVID era of the company. Like many companies this was a difficult time for the company which unfortunately included reductions in workforce. Since this time base compensation raises were either skipped or delayed. For individual contributors bonuses were removed from compensation package (in the name of raising base compensation - more comments to follow). Additionally, stock is no longer part of the compensation package for individual contributors. Fitness dollars were cut in half and the internal recognition platform which allowed recognition to include a small amount of money was cut so severely it's no longer used by many at the company. In 2024 a division of the company went through a significant change to roles and re-leveling of the employees within the division. As an employee that went through this restructure of job titles and job levels I am only able to comment how this impacted me. The company uses an independent service to set base compensation levels which was performed for the job title and re-leveling process. Unfortunately, due to the delay and missed raises post COVID, it is clear the company is paying significantly below the market they chose to set. This was a choice the company made. Now many, including myself are being paid 15% + below the market level the company came up with. There is no timeframe for paying employees at the market rate they communicated. This is also after each employee was provided a minimum of a 5% raise at the end of 2024. Lastly, the company also announced significant increases to the benefits package this fall. They chose to supplement with certain services (which is good on paper and makes leadership appear good) however, these services have limited availability in certain areas of the country and unfortunately were no longer viable for me or my family. The benefits are no longer above the pack and are more so/so middle of the pack. Communication of the significance of the benefits changes was beyond poor and really frustrating. In summary, many compensation related changes have been made taking things away from employees all in the name of base compensation being most important for individual contributors. Following a small raise, job title changes, re-leveling, employees have the potential of being paid 15% + below the market rate the company has set with no communication on how long they are willingly paying employees below market.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I truly appreciate your perspective and recognize the concerns you’ve raised. I’m glad to hear that you feel supported in areas of self-care and see our mission reflected in our work. I also understand that recent changes in compensation, benefits, and communication have been frustrating and, at times, disappointing. Compensation and benefits are critical aspects of team member engagement, and we remain committed to evaluating and addressing these areas thoughtfully. Additionally, I understand how the changes to benefits have impacted employees differently based on individual circumstances. While the goal was to enhance support in key areas, we recognize that availability and usability are just as important as the offering itself. Your point about the timing of benefits communication is particularly important, and we will take this into account to ensure employees have the information they need to make the best choices for themselves and their families. I also hope that the base salary increase you received in December 2024 was meaningful and positive. At a 5% increase, it was designed to be above-market, and by sharing with you our goal and intent to purposely pay you above-market, at the 65th percentile (rather than what most companies aim for – at or below the 50th percentile), we are striving to signal that we value you and are prioritizing you. But we do this within meaningful financial constraints, including the need to reach annual profitability expectations. This is one of the reasons we’ve communicated that we will need a few years to get every core team member to that 65th percentile level, but that we’ll continue to prioritize this each annual planning cycle. I want to ensure that your concerns are heard. Please schedule a time with your Leadership team member, Linda Llewelyn, or me. Your feedback is valuable in shaping our approach moving forward, and I’d appreciate the chance to continue this conversation directly. Best, Dan Burton

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Oct 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Before 2025, the company's benefits and leadership were excellent.

Cons

As of 2025, all benefits have been suspended until the end of the year.

1
avatar
Health Catalyst Response
7mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We appreciate your recognition of the strengths the company had before this year and the dedication of team members during challenging times. As we shape our 2026 strategy, we’re carefully evaluating how we allocate resources to ensure organizational success, identifying where to invest and how to utilize those resources most effectively, all guided by a clear and focused plan. Your feedback is helpful, and we will continue to communicate updates as progress is made. -Ben Albert
3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All