Stable, comfortable engineering company - Systems Test Engineer Hologic Employee Review

4.0
Feb 7, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• Retains good engineers (most software engineers are 6+ years at Hologic) • Good Work/Life balance (rarely over 45 hours per week for exempt employees) • Competitive benefits (including retirement vesting & continuing education compensation) • Good middle-management helps keep engineers productive • Focus on people and purpose, which comes naturally • Healthy internship program

Cons

• Understaffed engineering group means the group is susceptible to disturbances (even vacations can cause unexpected issues in workflow) • Despite understaffed group, salaries are moderate • Neglected requirements documents cause major problems for an FDA-regulated group • Bad software culture leans away from Agile and Unit Testing, leading to too much dependence on the competence of individual software engineers • Not enough communication with the end-clients during development leads to decisions in a vacuum • Small size leads to lack of horizontal movement opportunities ("locked in" to a role) • Very informal on-boarding process for new engineers (likely due to the fact that the group rarely hires new engineers, outside of interns), despite the fact that strong domain knowledge is required to function well

avatar
Hologic Response
9y
Thank you for sharing your experiences. We’re committed to being a best employer, and your feedback helps us reach that commitment.

Explore other reviews about Hologic

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly people Work life balance is good when it's not busy

Cons

Might not be a good fit for those who are ambitious for their careers

3.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fair Pay, some pretty good teammates

Cons

Worked there a while back and overall Hologic was not much on work-life balance in the IT department. It is often expected to work extra hours during key projects/upgrades, but these projects could go on years or multiple long periods during a year. CIO had a punitive management style who reveled, proudly and vocally, in that role. Any communication to anyone outside of the IT department was also strongly micromanaged by the organization's CIO. This level of micromanagement and very vocal punitive management style all served in an attempt to hide much disorganization and level of noncompetence at that very top-level individual. Under the CIO are some decent directors however, but it was always dismaying to see what these direct reports to the CIO had to deal with. I believe after years it became so normalized to them that they stopped realizing what should be normal.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All