Not As Good As Advertised - Senior Technical Consultant IBM Employee Review

3.0
Jan 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ibm bought the company I was working at before I was an IBM employee. For the first year we basically dealt with engagements that were already started or were in the pipeline. After integrating, with the IBM nd it sales team, its like they didn't know we existed or hat we do so a lot of work went to other departments.

Cons

As an observation, IBM buys companies, and either lets them stand alone. As an example , an IBM company. Or they buy and a year later completely drop the old companies name. In the 3 years after 'Transfer of employment' (becoming IBM employees proper). The life span isn't long. I would guess of all of my previous coworkers at the company IBM bought, 30% or less are still there. Random RA's public sold to the public "as due to AI" are not the entire story. Seems the RA's come when sales are down and to keep stock price up, someone figure the magic number and look for salaries to cut a people along with them. I served 4 the 5th one got me. I assure you AI had nothin to do with AI. The down side is no one know who left. Peer, mentees, etc, gossip and getting bunce back email or not able to slack are how you find out. Managers aren't allowed to speak about it. The other side and far more concerning is while people come and go, when several people in your department/team/engagement leave, You ae expected to pick up the slack and deliver on the same timeline with fewer resources, or new far less experienced resources join, If you are in the area between a manager and lesser experienced (lower band rating) it's like being an endangered species. Another serious issue is middle management bloat. On certain engagements there are so many people involved that you get different directions from different people DAILY and it is counterintuitive to success. That's my $.02

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Jun 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Company work culture 2. benefits 3. learning resources

Cons

As IBM is a big firm, the process time might take bit longer

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All