Worst Company Hakkoda - Anonymous employee IBM Employee Review

1.0
Mar 19, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

No pros at all. Don’t join the company

Cons

I do not recommend working at Hakkoda/IBM:
They walk all over their employees and rely purely on nepotism and friendships. The main head in Costa Rica, who doesn’t even know where he’s standing. Previously, everything was fully remote, and now just to keep him in position they made a hybrid model. He is a terrible leader and only his friends are the ones who move forward. There are some contracts that at the moment of the merger with IBM were created, according to him under the name of top performers, and it was not like that—it’s just people who are part of his network of friends. The site manager was the first person who should have been let go during the merge, especially since his name was stained when most of his “top performers,” or better said “top nepos,” were scammed by one of his employees and what the company did was wash their hands of it. The scam in total was more than $500k. If you want to work in a toxic environment, join Hakkoda/IBM. One person joins and five people leave. The former top executives are similar; they are people who don’t even have the knowledge to lead the company and they also brought their children into the company, who went from junior to senior in one year. For example, when they come to Costa Rica, they are paid a buffet, and for the rest who are not from the United States they are given a very bad pizza. It’s clear that Latin America represents the backyard to keep exploiting talent. For employees who are actually going the extra mile and are not friends of the site manager, there are no growth opportunities, and those who are the favorites in Costa Rica already have assigned positions and are kept there with contracts that year after year pay them to force them to stay. At the moment of the merge with IBM they forced everyone to resign to avoid paying labor liabilities, and if not, they would let you go. This company disrespected the law and allowed a scam to happen when one of their favorite employees started asking all employees for money and IBM never did anything about it. Think twice if you believe an opportunity at Hakkoda an IBM company is good when the perks are basic and the health insurance is one of the worst that exists. When they sold the company to IBM, they had already gone a long time without closing high-value deals, so there were no opportunities to learn new things. And it’s a company that doesn’t even know what Artificial Intelligence is, even though they are always selling that as the objective of the company. When they do end year reviews, there are no growth opportunities and nothing tangible where you can see how your goals are reflected after each of these evaluations. These are the main takeaways: Leadership lacks transparency and consistent direction Perceived favoritism impacts promotions and opportunities Limited career growth for employees outside leadership’s inner circle Poor handling of internal concerns reduces trust in management High turnover and low morale across teams Unclear performance review and promotion processes Inconsistent treatment of employees across regions

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Jul 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company to work for!

Cons

Can't think of any cons...

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

637
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All