Glad to be an EX IBMer. - Systems Programmer IBM Employee Review

2.0
May 16, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I find it hard to think of anything positive to say. My management seemed tolerant and supportive of me taking time off or flexing my schedule when needed during recent family issues, but I can't help but feel that the time also was a big part of the reason I was declare "surplus" and ended up on the "resource action" list. I suppose the IBM name still carries some weight when used on a resume due to their past reputation, but I think that will change as more ex IBMers get into the workforce elsewhere. The large scale of the company does make a lot of information and resources available to you, but after working at 50-60 hours a week you don't have much time to take advantage of them.

Cons

I was spread so thin I could barely be effective in my primary support areas and hardly scraped by in other functions that were dumped on me. I worked on a team that went from 10 people down to 2 over 8 years in the position. Every time someone left, their work was piled on the remaining team members with a brief overview and they were now the 'expert' on something they barely were familiar with. I'm not talking simple tasks here. I'm referring to software and processes that take months toget a comfort level with and years to develop a complete knowledge and understanding of. You do not get training unless you count taking online classes on your own time after working way too many hours to begin with. I did not get a raise at all in the last 4 years working there even though I always had good reviews. In addition the yearly performance based variable pay went down every year even though I remainded a solid contributor and my team, department, and division were doing well. It is obvious that company does not actually care about the quality of service they give their customers. Reducing the cost of delivering the service is by far their biggest concern. Basically you keep things at status quo, not improve them. My skills diminished because I did not have access to the latest technology and training. This makes it hard to compete with others in the job market outside of IBM. Quarterly reports and news articles of fantastic results and positive outlooks, but there is no funding for your bonus, you will not get a salary increase, you cannot take that class, and that travel budgets are frozen. Now you even have to pay for your own network access, even if you are required to be able to connect remotely. You there is still exorbitant pay and golden parachutes for the executives. Benefits seem to be less and less and cost more and more out of pocket every year. There is no longer a true pension. They are forcing people to relocate or train replacements. The relocations are usually to undesirable areas with lower cost of living so you have to take a cut in pay as well and you have no guarantee of job longevity if you make the move. The moves are out of your own pocket as well and you have 30 days to decide to accept, 45 days to actually be there and working. I was in constant fear of loosing my job for the last several years, and it came to pass, even though I was working hard and my team was spread way too thin. There were always rumors of upcoming layoffs, moving jobs to cheaper centers or overseas, and other frightening scenarios. The rumors were true much more often than not. I typically learned much more about the future of the company and my job from rumors than from management sharing information. I would not recommend working for IBM to anyone other than someone just starting out in the workforce. You might think I'm just bitter because I was laid off, but I have felt this way for a long time. Even though I am currently still unemployed and looking for work and it sucks to have been let go like that after all I did for the company, I am actually glad that I no longer work for them and I have the opportunity and incentive to find some better and feel like I make a difference.

Explore other reviews about IBM

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

637
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All