A poor place only for those who are uncompetitive - Support Engineer IBM Employee Review

1.0
Aug 6, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- (Not a pro specifically, I work in Berry Street at North Sydney as a customer-facing senior server support) - Good for those who are uncompetitive - Good money if you know how to "drag hours" (please see cons below) - Brand name for those who does not know the working condition - You can come here to get the brand and then move on to other companies

Cons

*** Please vote for me if you like my review. People should know this before they even consider this company *** Too much contractors which dilutes the know-how of the company knowledge A dis-functioning company overall, with poor office supports like lack of computer equipments (still with a 15" CRT and a XP-capable laptop), cleaning ladies (my desk was not cleaned once in a year), no stationary and no meeting facilities so far. You dont get the key for the drawer for the desk you working on, unless you chase and cry for days. No projects/budgets for staff to play with IT “toys” or for future growth (bit like having a meeting room without the meeting facilities, everything "back to basic") so everything was "break and fix". No future growth whatsoever. Poor software being used (like Lotus Notes (a mail client similar to Outlook) which consumes more than twice the memory Outlook should in my laptop, does not handle mail properly, poor interface, cannot copy and paste in some case), staffs' productivity seriously discounted by using poor software like this. Again the “Same Time” (an instant messaging like Office Communicator/Live messenger) was poorly designed which consumes 150MB of memory. 150MB for instant messaging. Most staff across the teams shows a lack of IT proficiency, customers get angry because we lost customers' data/couldn't fix simple problems. This is far, far, far behind Microsoft's supporting standards. Problems are always fixed after the last minute. In one instance, the network team claims a *faulty cable* caused the network traffic to drop to unacceptably slow *IN ONE DIRECTION*; this was indeed caused by route-accounting turned on in one direction (router high CPU). The customer was affected for months, we spent tens of people from different teams, dragging the poor MS guy who focused on “this is not OS problem” and countless billable hours before I handled the case. Within two days the problem was fixed by the network team. Please give me a cable which affects traffic in one direction. Due to cost cutting, no 24-hr intermediate team/staff who provide initial problem isolation before the senior guys get it, we get 4 – 8 calls per night to support simple things like false alarm, disk full/disk failed alerts. This is a wield and a whole team is missing in the picture! No central management software deployed in the data center to prevent problems, rather, we fix it as it comes. Or, you get the worst problems which takes days to fix (if you are fast) because no preventive measures were taken. Good if you call this easy (or hard) money for 4 – 8 calls per night, bad if you have a wife/family living together (you are given a pager). I have a colleague who sleeps separately with his wife if he is assigned on-call for the week. This colleague happens to like the money, but his wife complains on the dropping living quality. Intranet documents/procedures show that AU is FAR BEHIND the standards set by US (IBM US still have staff/researchers writing state-of-the-art "Redbooks", building new products or super computers). I describe the IBM AU staff as "struggling".

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Jun 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Company work culture 2. benefits 3. learning resources

Cons

As IBM is a big firm, the process time might take bit longer

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

637
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All