It's Okay at Best - Technology Analyst Infosys Employee Review

2.0
Apr 27, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large variety of projects to work on. Flexible hours depending on project.

Cons

Can be assigned to work outside your desired career goals. Internal systems are cumbersome. Salary isn't the best. Company culture is given too much focus in office spaces/marketing.

avatar
Infosys Response
4y
Thank you for sharing your experience. We are grateful for your feedback about working at Infosys. At the company, our goal is to provide a positive workplace where team members can grow and achieve success, and we are sorry if you are not satisfied with the policies and processes we have in place. We encourage you to reach out to your manager or use our various resolution hubs, such as HEAR, to voice your concerns. We hope you continue to grow with us.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Jan 8, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good environment, opportunity to learn

Cons

Bad pay. barely pay to

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All