employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integra LifeSciences

Engaged Employer

Good stepping stone, terrible to build a career on. - Anonymous employee Integra LifeSciences Employee Review

2.0
Sep 1, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For a scientist position: Interesting work. Small company so it's easy to get involved in multiple projects and learn about things going on in other departments.

Cons

They tell you right off the bat they expect you to quit in a year or two. The company values saving money rather than promoting employees and keeping good knowledgable staff, which in my option is probably why they're always in trouble with the FDA. The turnaround rate is INSANELY high. This place is great if you just need a quick stepping stone, but don't expect to build a career here.

Explore other reviews about Integra LifeSciences

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Integra was an excellent place to work, good benefits, and also knowledgeable and helpful management

Cons

Workplace culture was impacted by a lack of employee engagement and willingness to work with others as a team. Management sought to resolve this issue, but made only slight progress.

1.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

To provide a balanced perspective, one positive aspect was the company's willingness to offer flexible work arrangements.

Cons

I would encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the company culture before joining. In my experience, the work environment lacked the level of professionalism and collaborative leadership I expected. Leadership decisions at the senior level often appeared to be driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective discussion and open engagement. Employees who did not align with the preferred direction could experience resistance rather than constructive dialogue. The culture felt more aligned with a "my way or the highway" management style than a collaborative and inclusive approach. I also experienced situations where information communicated about my performance appeared inconsistent with my actual work contributions and outcomes. Rather than constructive feedback supported by objective metrics and open discussion, I felt there were instances where narratives surrounding performance were inaccurate or misrepresented. This created concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the overall feedback process. The company has also faced regulatory challenges in the past, which may be worth researching independently as part of your due diligence process. My experience ultimately did not align with my expectations for leadership, transparency, and organizational culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All