Supportive co-workers but toxic culture and low pay - Sales Manager Jobber Employee Review

1.0
May 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Co-workers Helping small businesses be successful

Cons

Hire and fire culture Work from home change was delivered over a Slack video with zero consideration for employees Now expected to be in office Low low pay High expectations and "dangling a carrot" promotions that never materialized Drink the koolaid mentality. If you didn't, you were the problem. Promotions weren't based on performance, based on visibility and likability or cronyism → giving opportunities to friends or close connections rather than based on merit Looks like the company cares more about submitting fake reviews to hide the bad ones then they do actually working on the culture.

Explore other reviews about Jobber

1.0
Nov 26, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not a single positive during my time at Jobber

Cons

- Leadership has ZERO strategy to compete against the other players in the market. - Way too many convoluted processes that slow everyone down - They will recruit you from another company and then let you go with absolutely no notice or reason

11
3.0
Jun 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It's really a great business with a great product and product reputation. Work life balance is good. Honestly, I don't even mind the RTO mandates as long as it stays hybrid - the Toronto office is great. Some of the home-made tools being developed to speed up development with AI are actually pretty neat.

Cons

The culture in Engineering is turning really sour. I get the impression they're slowly trying to eliminate the People Manager role, which is "fine" until you realize that they have no interest in helping you grow and advance your career here. It's really sad to see, especially for those of us earlier in our careers who do want to move up and stick around long enough to see ourselves AND the business grow. They're trying to eliminate 1-1s under the guise of productivity and shipping out faster and getting managers more involved in dev work. And it does not look like the managers have much of a say. For the most part, you're seen as a replaceable code/feature monkey. Turnover is increasing, especially with those tenured, senior folks, and I don't think they care. Another issue I've ran into is the varying skill level of engineers. There are great engineers here. But, there are some engineers here who just entirely vibe code. And that behaviour is highly encouraged and seen as "impactful" in some teams. Well don't come crying when incidents have increased over the last 6 months then? To be fair, it is entirely team-dependent and some teams have a higher calibre, some lower.

12
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All