Starting entry level position post-grad remotely - Market Analyst Kemper Employee Review

4.0
Jun 29, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team and people, everyone is very knowledgeable and there is a good work hard, play hard culture. I have not been into the office yet for work but we were able to start online and meet people through video chat and learn a few things. Questions are encouraged and everyone is eager to teach you.

Cons

Training for a new position remotely is difficult because someone cannot just come over to your desk and show you how to so something, but my team has adapted well. Very ready to return to office! Hard to follow along meetings as a post graduate with acronyms, lingo, and unfamiliar data and hard to know what clarifying questions to ask sometimes, but I understand a little bit better each day. Asking to record meetings has been most helpful for me.

Explore other reviews about Kemper

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Solid work environment at Kemper

Cons

Pay is lower than what I would have liked

1.0
Jul 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote role, starting pay is $93k and the selection of benefits are great.

Cons

As an experienced major loss adjuster with decades in the industry, I found this to be one of the most heavily micromanaged claims environments I have worked in. In my experience, file management was closely monitored with significant emphasis on diary compliance, activity metrics, documentation, and "clicks," leaving little opportunity to focus on thoughtful claim handling. The expected inventory was communicated to be approximately 150 to 175 exposures, which I found difficult to reconcile with the level of investigation, litigation management, and customer service expected on complex claims. Despite hiring experienced adjusters, there was virtually no autonomy in managing files, and independent claim judgment was significantly limited by constant oversight and administrative metrics. Training did not adequately prepare new adjusters to navigate the company's proprietary software, numerous internal policies, and complex coverage determinations, including issues involving unlisted drivers, unlisted vehicles, and policy cancellations for non-payment of premium. I found the performance standards and metrics to be unrealistic given the workload and the level of training provided. Management communication was frequent and often disruptive. In my experience, there were regular interruptions throughout the workday by phone calls, Teams messages, emails, and redundant diary reminders, making it difficult to maintain focus on complex claims. Expectations regarding video calls were also inconsistent. I was initially told that my attire during unscheduled video calls was not a concern, but later instructed to dress professionally at all times because supervisors could initiate video calls without notice. Although the company emphasizes inclusion and employee support, my experience was that management's actions did not always align with those values. After raising concerns through HR regarding management, I was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan shortly thereafter and ultimately my employment ended. That was my personal experience, and prospective employees should consider it when evaluating the company's culture. This position may be a good fit for individuals who are comfortable working in a highly structured, metrics-driven environment with constant management oversight. However, if you value professional judgment, autonomy, consistent expectations, and the ability to independently manage complex claims, my experience suggests this may not be the right environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All