Too Much Politics, Not Enough Engineering Focus - Senior Software Engineer Kickdrum Employee Review

5.0
Nov 24, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

While the company has a lot of potential and some talented individuals, there appears to be an imbalance in its workforce dynamics.

Cons

The company has more politicians than engineers. Innovation is hindered by excessive bureaucracy and political maneuvering. Decision-making often prioritizes internal politics over technical solutions. Focus on finding faults, defects in employee. Faults converted to alligation

avatar
Kickdrum Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We’re sorry to hear that your experience didn’t align with the culture we strive to build at Kickdrum. While we’re proud of our talented team and the potential we’re unlocking, we recognize that maintaining a transparent, innovation-driven, and respectful work environment requires continuous effort. We strive on constructive feedback and have multiple platforms in place for our employees to share their thoughts and experiences. We take all feedback seriously and remain committed to fostering a culture where open dialogue, fairness, and collaboration are the norm. Your perspective helps us reflect and improve, and we truly appreciate you voicing it.

Explore other reviews about Kickdrum

4.0
May 25, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great at providing employee support.

Cons

Bad at giving free time.

avatar
Kickdrum Response
3y
Thank you for the feedback. We believe in work-play-learn and attempt to give equal emphasis to all three. As an organization, we try to strike a balance between work and play by having meeting free Fridays, flexible leaves, weekly sports outings, and hybrid work options to name a few.
2.0
Jul 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The office had decent snacks and the Austin location itself is nice.

Cons

I entered the establishment with the expectation that the diversity and inclusion messaging I had encountered would be genuine, but it was nothing more than a facade. Every meeting had someone talking about how committed we were to DEI, we had all these initiatives and discussion groups, but when it came to actual decision-making and who got promoted or heard in the room it was the same people every single time. I watched people from underrepresented groups bring ideas that went nowhere and then a few months later someone else would get credit for basically the same thing. The constant talking points about inclusion made it worse somehow, because the gap between what we said and what we did was so obvious. I am not asking for perfection but the disconnect between all the messaging and the reality was exhausting and demoralizing.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All