Avoid the sales org (unrealistic quotas) - Account Executive Klaviyo Employee Review

1.0
Mar 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- generous benefits & perks - solid work-life balance - hybrid work model that doesn't feel "enforced"

Cons

- $2.7M ARR target for Mid Market with ACV of $50k which requires you to close 40+ deals a year to hit your target - ^Only a handful of reps are overachieving; most of us are stuck in a 70-90% pigeon-hold - Downgrades count against you, meaning you can be selling against a deficit (some AEs will have -$50k in their name to start a month due to territory restructuring) - Generally, product isn't sales-centric. Was historically an SMS add-on for SMBs due to Shopify, struggling to gain traction upmarket - Add the end of the day, reps only get paid about 4% on the deals closed (low compared to SaaS industry standards of 7-10%)

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefit, good WLB, genuine good people

Cons

The race to inject AI into everything has really sucked the soul out of this job

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All