I talked to 35 companies before finding Klaviyo. - Product Klaviyo Employee Review

5.0
Jan 12, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Klaviyo is a unique culture. Every start up claims to want to move fast, be transparent, give people opportunity to influence the business and be fun. Fine. What's different here is that our CEO is incredibly intelligent and an exceptional software engineer. The team leads are passionate, selfless people who advocate for their teams and the business over themselves. If problems arise (let's face it, when you're growing 3-4x a year and scaling our backend systems to support 3x volume every year, that will happen) people don't point fingers - they swarm as a team to find the problem and defeat it. I've never felt so lucky to work so hard and see my sisters and brothers in the trenches right next to me, regardless of rank, past experience or responsibility.

Cons

Klaviyo is not for the faint of heart - you must be smart, you must be ambitious, you must care and you must want to build a pillar company in Boston. Otherwise, this won't be fun for you. If that first sentence motivates you, then let's go.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All