Great place to learn and grow - Anonymous employee Klaviyo Employee Review

5.0
May 14, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I've been at Klaviyo for about a year. The team has grown a lot, and the leadership has expanded a lot at the same time. Andrew (CEO) and others are good at identifying problems and working to solve them. My coworkers generally all get along very well and help each other. They're good people to work with. Compensation is pretty good compared to other companies I've worked at / my friends work at now. Not the highest but pretty good. I like my manager a lot, they listen well, take feedback, and help solve my problems.

Cons

We have a lot of long hours and stress, but it's getting better. Benefits are getting better, a year ago they weren't great but they've been making good improvements to them.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All