This company saved me - Sales Klaviyo Employee Review

5.0
Jul 25, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everything. I came from a big corporate company, and there's just no comparison. The people at Klaviyo are genuinely kind, smart, and enthusiastic about their work. The environment and culture are welcoming, fun, and engaging. Management is awesome -- they work with you, listen to you, and help you grow. Everyone on the team offers to help you and wants to help you succeed. There's free lunch every week, events throughout the year, an incentive to work hard, and plenty of reasons to stay. This is not a company where you go for a short period of time, try it out, and leave for something bigger and better. This IS what's bigger and better. A young start-up company making their way up to pass their competitors, growing rapidly and expanding, and also keeping their people happy. For the first time in a long time, I enjoy my work. I'm passionate about a company, I believe in a product, and I'm well-taken care of. Props to Klaviyo for winning in every way -- from our new hammocks in the office to the green bean bag chairs, to the people who stay past 7 pm on a Friday to hang out in the office and socialize.

Cons

Can't think of a single thing.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All