Fab company culture - Anonymous employee Klaviyo Employee Review

5.0
Aug 15, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Young team - Vibrant and fun people! - Social's once a month minimum with your team and other office wide initiatives on top - Lunch provided most Thursdays - Management is incredible, always going above and beyond when it comes to ensuring my success at Klaviyo - Quarterly sales kick off's that really set the quarter up for success and acknowledges people's successes from the previous. - very collaborative team mentality whereby we always share what's working well, collaborate on responses/calls etc - bi-weekly team training - career progression is spoken about in-depth once a quarter but can also be tracked every one:one (once a week) - everyone is super friendly even between teams and orgs

Cons

- A lot of change happens on a monthly basis due to how quickly we are growing. Both as a team but also as a company - targets are achievable but they do push you - not as diverse as I'd like

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefit, good WLB, genuine good people

Cons

The race to inject AI into everything has really sucked the soul out of this job

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All