Great people, great opportunity, great product - let’s go! - Anonymous employee Klaviyo Employee Review

5.0
Oct 14, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Fantastic team spirit in EMEA with genuine passion around what we are trying to do with clients and investing in people for their growth. - Hybrid policy that works…fantastic facility with everything you could want when you do go in. - Great senior leadership in EMEA. - Incredibly smart founders. - Nice benefits… 22 weeks full pay for primary care giver and 16 for secondary, unlimited holiday, free books (any books!) to name a few. - Incredible performance data in recent year and YOY growth. - Unlimited avocados!

Cons

- Fast growth = ambiguity / lack of clear plan in some areas but the company is conscious of this in hiring people that excel with that. - Company need to be quicker to accelerate outside of the US and focusing on mid market + to take advantage of the fantastic opportunity that lies ahead, it’s clear where the continued growth lies for us. - US influence has a tendency to over complicate with bureaucracy simple things that slow us down.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Klaviyo is an amazing place to work, the culture is great, perks are amazing, and the people really care about their roles and the company.

Cons

So many product launches, are to keep up with the many many changes.

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All