What happened? - Anonymous employee Klaviyo Employee Review

2.0
Jul 21, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People on the team level are great. Everyone is kind, helpful, and motivated to do great work. Benefits are good, though compensation is lacking given we that we want to become "one of the greats." The company is doing well financially, people love the product.

Cons

Over the last couple of years, overall company and team culture has decline. We didn't scale effectively (over-hired) and shifted priorities around constantly. We're all at the mercy of our CEO who tends to micromanage. Instead of solving problems, they deflect and provide unproductive solutions. VPs and directors don't create the best work environment. There's too much forced culture and fake performative work. Promoting your work is more important than the work actually is. Leadership does little to address real concerns on the team. When asked difficult questions, they deflect and point the finger. When concerns are brought up about certain team members/leaders, they ignore them. Overall, there's no longer a sense of psychological safety and that will be hard to repair. The company is shifting away from remote-first and are headstrong on going back into the office.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All