Committed to the war fighter - Manager L3Harris Employee Review

5.0
Nov 28, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everyone is committed to protecting our war fighters and use that goal to make decisions and guide our conduct. People look to do the right thing, and there is a sense of comradery among the employees.

Cons

Facility is older but is being upgraded and really isn't that bad.

avatar
L3Harris Response
6y
Thank you for taking the time to leave us a review. The work our employees perform supports matters of national security, and our values of integrity, excellence, and respect are evident in our workforce! As an international company with locations in over 33 countries, facilities vary in age and our facilities team works hard to make updates to some of our older facilities. We are happy to hear your experience with us so far has been positive!

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All