n/a - Anonymous employee L3Harris Employee Review

1.0
Jan 4, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

nothing at all. don't waste your time here

Cons

low wage! Bad moral. 2-3% yearly increases

avatar
L3Harris Response
5y
L3Harris’ compensation strategy is designed to attract, retain and motivate top talent – promoting an engaged workforce while also remaining business competitive and cost responsive to our customers and shareholders. Our philosophy rewards and recognizes employees based on their achievement of individual objectives, and their role in helping the company achieve its objectives. Also, L3Harris annually participates in several high-technology, global salary surveys to understand the pay levels of the companies for which we compete for talent in the marketplace. Thanks for leaving us a review.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Passionate people - Lots of work - Open to new implementation

Cons

- Ladder climb is a bit unstructured.

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All